Click:Wicket bag making machine
Senators from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative on Friday urging him to keep language that mimics a U.S. tech liability shield to be left out of any potential free trade agreement with the United Kingdom.
The letter, signed by two Democrats and two Republicans, urges Trade Representative Robert LighthizerBob LighthizerWhiskey, workers and friends caught in the trade dispute crossfire GOP senator warns quick vote on new NAFTA would be ‘huge mistake’ Pelosi casts doubt on USMCA deal in 2019 MORE to refrain from including language that is modeled on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in a trade agreement with the U.K.
The senators note the ongoing debate regarding Section 230, which grants tech companies liability protection for content posted by third parties.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Including a safe harbor clause in any future trade agreements will further allocate more power to companies at the expense of individuals,” Sens. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerOn The Money: Congress passes bill to avert shutdown as coronavirus talks drag into weekend | Federal Reserve fight imperils relief talks Congress passes bill to avert shutdown as coronavirus talks drag into weekend Lawmakers call for Trump to take action on massive government hack MORE (D-Va.), Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanHillicon Valley: Lawmakers ask whether massive hack amounted to act of war | Microsoft says systems were exposed in massive SolarWinds hack | Senators push to keep tech liability shield out of UK trade agreement Senators push to keep tech liability shield out of UK trade agreement The ‘Biden Team’ is risk-averse, but capable and ready MORE (R-Ohio), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyHillicon Valley: Lawmakers ask whether massive hack amounted to act of war | Microsoft says systems were exposed in massive SolarWinds hack | Senators push to keep tech liability shield out of UK trade agreement Senators push to keep tech liability shield out of UK trade agreement Pelosi to get COVID-19 vaccine in ‘next few days’ as vaccination program begins for lawmakers MORE (R-Iowa) wrote.
“Congress can and should debate about Section 230 and how it has enabled platforms to turn a blind eye as their platforms are used to facilitate discrimination, cyber-stalking, terrorism, online frauds, and more. We urge USTR to refrain from including this provision in this and future free trade agreements until that debate has concluded,” they added.
A spokesperson for the Office of the United States Trade Representative was not immediately available for comment.
The debate around Section 230 has heated up in recent months as President TrumpDonald TrumpPompeo: Russia ‘pretty clearly’ behind massive cyberattack US government caught blindsided over sophisticated cyber hack, experts say Trump signs bill to keep government open amid relief talks MORE has repeatedly called for the rule to be repealed.
Trump targeted Section 230 in an executive order earlier this year.
ADVERTISEMENT
Most recently, the president has threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the annual defense policy bill, because it does not include a Section 230 repeal. The NDAA passed both chambers of Congress with veto-proof majorities last week.
Trump and GOP allies have backed calls to repeal Section 230, alleging tech companies have targeted conservative voices.
But Democratic President-elect Joe BidenJoe BidenFederal agency says employers can require workers to get COVID-19 vaccine Pompeo: Russia ‘pretty clearly’ behind massive cyberattack US to close two Russia consulates MORE has also indicated support for repealing Section 230, as Democrats have accused tech giants of not taking enough of a stand against online misinformation and hate speech.
Trump’s executive order targeting Section 230 may die in courts or be ignored by the incoming administration, but legislation on the tech rule will likely be introduced in the new Congress.